HONESTY BOX Our news isn’t free for those who work to bring it to you; we depend on donations and book investment (click Team Work). Please share our stories and purchase from our bookstore.

In the 3000 years since the end of the Stone Age, the native people of Africa could not manage to create an infrastructure, could not mine or produce export, could, in fact not succeed in building anything higher than one storey and could not write down anything as reference for future generations, because they could not manage to master the art of writing.

When the first Europeans arrived on April 6, 1652, it was 1,974 years after Ptolemy I built the magnificent library of Alexandria,  and in Southern Africa, the indigenous people still could do no more than a few rock paintings and a clay pot with patterns on it. Today, this development, this contribution of the descendants of Europe has become a threat to the Black South African. He cannot compare. He has no contribution that can remotely compare to what the white man created and therefore he has to fall back on what primal instinct tells him to do: Destroy that which is a threat to you!

It is against this background that the white South African is demonised as a ‘slaver and murderer who stole land’. Let us put this in perspective:


In the first place: The Europeans who came with Van Riebeeck had no intention to stay at the Cape. We can clearly determine this from the repeated application for transfer to Batavia or Amsterdam made by almost every Company servant. The few men, who decided to make this their homeland, did so because they came to love the land. They wanted to develop and grow here. And in the written evidence, left us by the men who did not intend to stay and therefore had no reason to lie; it is written down over and over again that the Europeans settled on the uninhabited land.

They exchanged land for cattle and money and traded with the nomadic indigenous people. The Company decided to import slaves. I emphasize import because no indigenous person in this country was ever put into slavery.

The slaves who were brought in from Madagascar and Batavia and Ceylon and East Africa were the ancestors of an entirely new group of people: the Coloured nation of South Africa who adopted the customs and culture of the European. Ever wondered why they did not adopt the custom of Africa? Because they were not exposed to it, that is why! Nobody at the Cape ever set eyes on a black person for 130 years before the first Trekboere met the Xhosa in the Valleys of the Amatola around 1770!

These slaves also added to the bloodline of the European settlers, as did the French Huguenots of 1688 and the British Settlers of 1820. The White South African was a new nation, born in Africa. This nation called its language, Afrikaans, after Africa. This nation called itself after Africa, Afrikaners.

On the first of December 1834, slavery was abolished in the Cape Colony. This is two years before the start of the Great Trek. The white man in South Africa knew nothing of the existence of the Zulu, the Tswana, the Sotho, the Venda…and he was at war with the Xhosa.  It is chronologically impossible that indigenous people could be held in slavery if the so-called slave masters did not even know of their existence before the abolition of slavery.


Let us look at the ‘great’ Shaka Zulu and the Zulu nation. Remember that the Europeans landed in South Africa in 1652. Shaka Senzaghakohona was born around 1787. He managed to unite, through force and murder and rampage a number of small tribes into the Zulu nation around 1819. Before that year, there were no Zulu people.

A question of mathematics: The Zulu nation came into existence only 167 years after the arrival of Van Riebeeck. What logic can possibly argue that the Europeans took anything away from the Zulu-people? So when did the black man establish himself in South Africa and how? The answer lies in the Mfecane: Mfecane (Zulu: [m̩fɛˈkǀaːne],[note 1] crushing), also known by the Sesotho name Difaqane (scattering, forced dispersal or forced migration[1]) or Lifaqane, was a period of widespread chaos and warfare among indigenous ethnic communities in southern Africa during the period between 1815 and about 1840.


As King Shaka created the militaristic Zulu Kingdom in the territory between the Tugela River and Pongola River, his forces caused a wave of warfare and disruption to sweep to other peoples. This was the prelude of the Mfecane, which spread from there. The movement of peoples caused many tribes to try to dominate those in new territories, leading to widespread warfare; consolidation of other groups, such as the Matebele, the Mfengu and the Makololo; and the creation of states such as the modern Lesotho. Mfecane is used primarily to refer to the period when Mzilikazi, a king of the Matebele, dominated the Transvaal. During his reign, roughly from 1826 to 1836, he ordered widespread killings and devastation to remove all opposition.

He reorganised the territory to establish the new Ndebele order. The death toll has never been satisfactorily determined, but the whole region became nearly depopulated. Normal estimates for the death toll range from 1 million to 2 million.

The black man established himself in this barren land now known as South Africa a full 174 years after the white man. How dare you then call me a settler when you are nothing more? If I don’t belong here then neither do you.

The land was stolen from the black man? No. The land occupied by the Boer-people was land that nobody lived on, for the pure and simple reason that the original people of South Africa were massacred and wiped out in a racist genocide by the ancestors of the current black population of South Africa.

It is the very same thing that is now happening to Europeans. The European has a full and legal and historical claim to his part of this country, including land. And the black man who disputes that is welcome to bring evidence of the contrary.

Remember, popular liberal myth, propagandistic expressions and loud shouting and burning and looting to hide your own incapability is not evidence. It is barbarism.

The popular myth of “the end of colonialism” is a lie also. Colonialism in South Africa ended on 31 May 1961 when the country became a Republic. White minority rule was not colonialism, because the white South African belongs here, you cannot colonise your own country. The entire uproar about white oppression and white guilt and white debt is based, exactly like the concept of the rainbow nation and its Africa-democracy, on one big lie.

In Afrikaans, a language of Africa, we say: However swiftly the lie might travel, the truth will catch up one day. Black South Africa might as well realise that the time of the lie is running out. Stereotyping of the white man and apartheid as the cause of everything, cannot hold much longer. You cannot hide rotting meat under gift wrap for eternity.


Sometime in the very near future you will have to own up and explain how you could hold a small minority of oppressed people responsible for the disaster that you have made of a country which has the potential of being a place of safety, a welcome and hospitable home, to all its children whether they be black, white, coloured on Indian.


The black man holds the key to the final destruction of what is left, or the final realisation that we have no other choice but to peacefully co-exist. The black South African can no longer avoid admitting that the destruction of the white South African necessarily means the destruction of everything and everyone left on the southern tip of Africa. ~ D Lötter. 

KEEP REAL NEWS OPEN: Donate by using PayPal, Western Union or registered mail. 2) Follow our blog. 3) Share our stories and 4) buy our books. 5) Receive free newsletters by writing subscribe to Click ‘Mike Walsh’ to meet the publisher of The Ethnic European.

1_ AKF1
Purchase on Amazon
Purchase on Amazon



Financial Investment.



This slideshow requires JavaScript.


  • The blacks would not be a factor at all if it was not for the powerful financial and political forces behind what has happened in Africa over the last fifty years. This, coupled with the naïve assumption of the whites that they could come to equitable terms with their mortal enemies, is what has led to the catastrophe that is present South Africa. Blacks are savages and will steal and destroy everything until there is nothing left to destroy. They are incapable of doing anything else. It is the international manipulators behind the scenes who are responsible to a large degree. However, it does not excuse the incredible stupidity of the whites who allowed themselves to be disarmed and disenfranchised. Whites lacked a philosophy of survival of the fittest. They should have not only maintained Apartheid but dramatically enhanced it so that there was virtually no connection at all between whites and blacks, so that whites had a whole country completely to themselves. That is the only way they could have survived. Demographics would have destroyed them in the end anyway if they had remained comingled with the blacks. With their own country they could have encouraged large families and immigration of other white people to take up whatever slack was needed in the labour market. With a well developed military they would have been more than a match for anything Africa could have thrown at them, and even from threats by the mercenary military of the US and Britain. Now, unfortunately, there is little to be optimistic about. The three hundred year settlement by whites is coming to a close. Hopefully, some of the survivors will make it to new lands such as Australia, Argentina and Russia where they can thrive again in safer conditions. Perhaps they can also pass on any lessons learned about the nature of blacks and the way the world really works.

    Liked by 2 people

    • I believe some have moved to PARAGUAY as well, a country which has scattered German populations including the Mennonites, and to which many Germans are moving as they are now fearful of their safety in Germany due to the behaviours of the invaders there and Merkels’ lack of protections against it. Paraguay has a low cost of living and a lot of freedoms from petty rules & regulations found in the cultural marxist First World.

      Liked by 1 person

  • very wise, very sad…

    Liked by 1 person

  • By Anand Chetty : I SPEAK ON BEHALF of a sizeable portion of South Africa who would once and for all like to know exactly which whites stole which pieces of land and from which blacks. The message that goes out from the presumptious EFF and thus indirectly from the ANC is that all land was stolen from all blacks by all whites… Not only does Juliass malema makes such false statements, but many others too who support him, so this is a serious issue which requires serious clarity. Let’s look at one small example. In 1834 the king of the Pondos, King Faku, gave the land between the Mbashe and Mkomazi rivers to the Dutch settlers on the condition that they go and live there. He wanted them as a buffer between him and Dingane who constantly stole his cattle and tried to chase him off his land. Another agreement was in February 1838, when Dingane himself signed a treaty allowing Piet Retief and his group of approximately 100 Voortrekkers to occupy the land between the Tegula River and Port St. John’s.. (a copy of this agreement can still be found today). In 1825, when Shaka met the British for the first time, he allowed the British to take control of what was then called Port Natal, and, in return for this gesture, 2 British commanders, known as Fynn and Farewell, presented Shaka with beads, brass, blankets made of cloth, and other small inventions that could have very easily been brought over by ship. These are just a few examples of some land that whites legally, or by mutual agreement, acquired from blacks. These stretches of land, and the farms on this land today, certainly cannot be defined as stolen… Our history is littered with such barters and gifts, where land was traded for cattle or in many cases given as a reward for returning lost or stolen cattle from a neighbouring tribe to its original tribe. As for King Faku, the question is whether the land was Faku’s to give in the first place. He, or his predecessor, undoubtedly took it by force from another hapless black tribe… Stealing, you may call it. Of course Dingaan also tried to get his hands on it. He, and particularly Shaka before him, “stole” massive pieces of land; in fact they chased the Matabele people off their land, all the way to Zimbabwe where they still live. The Matabele may argue that a large part of South Africa rightfully belongs to them and that the current black inhabitants should depart. Needless to say that, even before the black tribes started “stealing” land from each other, the San people lived here. They have the strongest claim of all. To add a twist, by studying old documents and reading old diaries, you discover that vast areas of land were uninhabited when the Dutch arrived, basically no-man’s land. These areas got occupied and vacated almost at random, as a result of regional wars (or exterminations by other tribes) that took place from time to time. The only difference between the Dutch who settled there and the previous occupants, who were gone, was that the Dutch were able to defend their positions and were not driven away. I’m not sure how to bring this letter to the attention of juliass mal malema and those who think like him. It is a very serious issue, since the disregard of treaties, no matter how old, tends to de-stabilize whole regions. We need clarity about the grounds on which juju mal malema’s own claims are based… If he is not interested in historic fact or the historic treaties that his forefathers entered into (not to mention those made by the ANC with the NP in 1994), and if he simply wants to seize land belonging to whites, then he is of course, planning to cause unrest, #RaceagainstRace ….To My Critic’s it’s Not a White Thing, It’s The Right Thing…

    Liked by 2 people

    • Lauren Southern’s long awaited up-to-date documentary called

      “FARMLANDS (2018) Official Documentary” is now released FREE: (just over an hour long).

      She states:
      “Thank you so much for watching everyone… this documentary was created thanks to your wonderful support and donations. I’ve uploaded it totally free to watch, so if you can do one favor for all the effort everyone put into creating this – please please share it with at least one person. Spread the word so these stories are not forgotten.”

      So please everyone, share it out worldwide and post it everywhere.
      Thank you for this forum on which to share it, Mike.

      There is a wonderful Christian Black American on youtube, JESSE LEE PETERSON, from whom I got the above link and info. He is a true fighter for White people everywhere! He is against the lies told about White people everywhere and he is against the hatred being sewn into the hearts of non-Whites against Whites everywhere.

      Here he has a short interview with Lauren Southern about her visit to South Africa (13 mins):

      Lauren Southern on South Africa: FARMLANDS (Are Whites History?)

      Liked by 1 person

    • Be aware that all these Black South African leaders from Mandela on….are controlled by the international Money Power. This 2016 piece reveals how its done. Note they are about protecting the independence IN PARTICULAR of the mining and the banks from nationalisation (in the clip within the article):


      2) The role of Cyril Ramaphosa, a former mineworkers’ union leader and leading figure in the ANC, he was on Lonmin’s executive board at the time. He urged government ministers to come down hard on the “criminal” workers.

      Liked by 1 person

    • You’re missing the point Angus. What’s ‘right’ is irrelevant in Africa. Might makes right is the law there. The blacks have the power now and they are going to use it to take what they want. They want the white man’s land and wealth and they are going to take it because they think that he can’t prevent them. That is what it comes down to. Some blacks may realise that they are bringing about their own destruction by destroying farming and the infrastructure of the country but they have little influence. It’s how things work in Africa and how they have always worked. How did the South African whites imagine that it could ever be otherwise? They had countless demonstrations which showed them what was going to happen, yet they still handed over power. I remember talking to several whites about the looming hand over in 1993 during my last visit there and was amazed by their naïve outlook. Unless whites develop a ruthless philosophy of always putting their own people first they will lose everything everywhere. To paraphrase a line from a well known film, ‘we have been targeted for termination’.

      Liked by 2 people

  • Problem is, blacks are way behind on the evolution ladder. It is just not PC to admit it.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s